Gert. R. Polli, Deutschland zwischen den Fronten

Abhören unter Freunden gehe gar nicht, so einer der vielen Dummsprüche von Kanzlerin Angela Merkel, als durch die Snowden-Enthüllungen bekannt wurde, dass der große US-Bruder und "Freund" nicht nur diese Bundeskanzlerin, sondern schon ihre Vorgänger abgehört hatte. Aber die Laienspielerschar in Berlin kann sich trösten, werden doch flächendeckend alle führenden Politiker in Europa von der NSA abhört und bespitzelt. 

Gert R. Polli war mehr als 25 Jahre Berufsoffizier beim Österreichischen Bundesheer und dort überwiegend im militärischen Auslandsnachrichtendienst tätig. Im Jahr 2002 wurde er mit der Gründung und Leitung des österreichischen zivilen Nachrichtendienstes, dem Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz und Terrorismusbekämpfung (BVT), betraut, die er bis 2008 innehatte. Aktuell ist seine private Sicherheitsfirma polli-IPS (Intelligence & Public Safety) in der Abwehr von Betriebs- und Wirtschaftsspionage spezialisiert.

Ist es vielleicht ein Zufall, dass deutsche Großunternehmen und Großbanken in den USA mit milliardenschweren Klagen überzogen werden? Oder, dass deutsche Unternehmen so gut wie keinen Fuß mehr in den USA auf die Erde bekommen? Deutschland ist das Land, dass am stärksten von allen westlichen, östlichen und nahöstlichen Geheimdiensten ausspioniert werde, so Gert R. Polli in seiner aufrüttelnden Analyse über die desolate Situation der deutschen Geheimdienste und die Naivität der deutschen politischen Klasse. Deutschlands Feinde sind nicht im Osten sondern im Westen. 

Es bedarf eines Österreichers, um den politisch-korrekten Deutschen den Spiegel vorzuhalten. Als Insider warnt er vor Fehlentwicklungen. Deutschland sei nicht souverän und ein US-Vasallen-Staat. Eine falsch verstandene Partnerschaft mit den USA habe zu einer umfassenden Kontrolle und Überwachung Europas und vor allem Deutschlands geführt. An vorderster Front: amerikanische Geheimdienste und ihre Zuträger. 

Die USA seien Nutznießer dieser Entwicklung. Prominentestes Beispiel dieser US-Dominanz sei "die faktische Gleichschaltung und Kontrolle europäischer Nachrichtendienste unter dem Mantel der gemeinsamen Terrorismusbekämpfung, die es nur auf dem Papier gegeben hat". Die unkritische Übernahme der antirussischen US-Politik durch die EU und insbesondere durch Kanzlerin Merkel habe zu einer wirtschaftlichen Konfrontation mit Russland geführt, die wesentlich zu Lasten Deutschlands gehe. Wissen wir nicht spätestens seit George Friedman, dem Gründer des von der CIA finanzierten Think Tanks Stratfor, dass es seit über 100 Jahren US-Politik ist, eine Annäherung Deutschlands und Russlands zu verhindern? 

Nicht nur Deutschland, sondern auch die EU wird von dem US-Imperium vor sich hergetrieben, und dies auch in der so genannten Flüchtlingskrise. "Die derzeitige Flüchtlingskrise ist u. a. eine verzögerte Auswirkung jener Koalition unter der Führung der USA, die zur Destabilisierung einer gesamten Region geführt hat." Anstatt sich von den USA abzukoppeln, unterwerfen sich Merkel und Co. immer stärker den USA zum Schaden Deutschlands und der EU. Bei dem Berliner Personal darf das jedoch niemanden wundern.

Dass dieses politisch hochbrisante Buch von den Mainstream-Medien bisher verschwiegen worden ist, überrascht nicht, sind sie doch alle Sprachrohre des US-Imperiums. Die führenden außenpolitischen Ressortleiter sind "gekaufte Journalisten", die die Presseerklärungen des Pentagons umschreiben. "Deutschland ist bis heute ein besetztes Land. Mehr noch: Der Verdacht ist nicht von der Hand zu weisen, dass die USA im Wege ihrer vertraglich abgesicherten Zusammenarbeit mit BND und Verfassungsschutz Deutschland zu einer Drehscheibe ihrer elektronischen Aufklärung in Europa ausgebaut haben." 

Kanzlerin Merkel verhält sich ebenso wie Erich Honecker servil gegenüber dem Großen Bruder, in ihrem Falle dem aus Washington, als das US-Imperium Russland zum Feindbild stempelte. "Damit hat die Regierung Merkel die Sichtweise neoliberaler Kreise aus den USA übernommen. (...) Für diesen Fall hat Deutschland seine Glaubwürdigkeit leichtfertig aufs Spiel gesetzt." Deutschland sollte sich auf soziale Unruhen vorbereiten. 

Würde die politische und mediale Nomenklatura ihr Denken an nationalen Interessen ausrichten, sollte sie dieses Buch von der ersten bis zur letzten Seite lesen. Bei dem außenpolitischen Personal scheint dies jedoch ein frommer Wunsch zu bleiben. Dass die Medienklasse dieses Buch bisher keines Wortes gewürdigt hat, spricht Bände. Chapeau, Herr Polli!

Israel's Ten Myths

Particularly, in the US and some European States, the Israeli and Zionist versions of history are wide-spread. Israel’s narrative relies on a collection of myths aimed at bringing the moral right and the ethical behavior of the Palestinians into twilight and making their claim to their country appear as illegitimate. Israel’s negation of Palestinian existence in the Land of Palestine is, however, a falsification of history. 

“Ten Myths About Israel” was published in Germany in 2016 under the title ”What’s wrong with Israel? The Ten Main Myths of Zionism”. The mainstream media ignored it, which could also be the case in the US. It’s sad but that how media power works in favor of Israel. 

Israeli historian Ilan Pappe, who lives in exile in Britain, deals in this book with the myths of Zionism and exposes them as legends consisting of half-truths and fabrications of history. The Zionist narrative has only little to do with historical reality and truth. 

The “Running Gag” of the Zionist historical narrative is the story of the “empty land” of Palestine, into which people without a land had finally returned after 2000 years of exile. The slogan of a country without a people, for people without a country, is the most prominent expression of the Zionist mythology. For Pappe, it’s less important whether the Jews existed as a people, rather than that the Zionists deny the existence of a Palestinian population but simultaneously claim that the State of Israel represents all the Jews of the world and does everything for their benefit and acts for them. Such a claim is just as daring as the identification of Zionism with Judaism because it takes Jews hostage for Israel’s despising policy. 

The Zionists presented the colonization of Palestine with biblical rhetoric; this served only as a means to an end. The highest prophet of Zionism, Theodor Herzl, even considered Uganda and other places instead of the Zionist Promised Land. Finally, they found their roots in Palestine. “From then on, the Bible became both the justification and the guideline of the Zionist colonization of Palestine,” writes Pappe. He describes Zionism as a “colonial settler movement” and Israel as a “Settler Colonial State.” 

The author points out that the expulsion of the Palestinians in 1947/48 was “ethnic cleansing.” Likewise, the 1967 June war, which is also called the Sixth Day War, was not an act of self-defense of the “little David” against an overpowering “Goliath,” but an Israeli attack on which the Israeli security establishment has minutely prepared for years. 

The claim of being the “only democracy in the Middle East” is put in the right perspective. Israel resembles rather an “ethnocracy” than a democracy in the classical sense of the meaning. The “peace process,” which was highly praised by the Western political establishment ended in the acceleration of the colonization of Palestine and in the establishment of Palestinian regime that has to do the dirty work for Israeli occupier. 

In his book, Ilan Pappe gives his backing for the historical truth that the Israeli political establishment must face if it is interested in peace. Israel’s security establishment abuses Judaism because it equates its Zionist expansionist and oppressive policy with Judaism. Enlightenment is, therefore, more than a necessity, which the book does excellently by deconstructing the mythological web that surrounds the history of the State of Israel. 

This book is an absolute must for an interested public, the political and the media class to understand what Israel is all about.

First published here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

Verso Publisher.

The CIA and its NGO-Helpers

F. William Engdahl

The Ancient Greeks knew: "Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful." No less a figure than the late Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CIA made use of this saying by recruiting the Muslim Brotherhood to fight a proxy war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, which led to the withdrawal of the Soviets from the Hindu Kush. Since then, the CIA used the mercenaries to fight more proxy wars in the Balkans, Chechnya, and Azerbaijan. Due to the wars of aggression against Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen the US and its vassal states created sectarian violence that led to civil wars. Right now, the CIA and the Muslim Brotherhood are present in the form of ISIS in Syria and Iraq. 

No one has studied this triad more intensively than F. William Engdahl who is a renowned geopolitical analyst, risk consultant, author, and lecturer. Engdahl was born in Minneapolis/MN, and grew up in Texas. After earning a degree in politics from Princeton University, and graduate study in comparative economics at Stockholm University, he worked as an economist and investigative journalist in the US and Europe. He was named Visiting Professor at Beijing University of Chemical Technology and delivers talks and private seminars around the world on different aspects of economics and politics with the focus on geopolitical events. For the last 30 years, Engdahl has been living in Germany. 

He has written numerous best-selling books on oil and geopolitics, "The Lost hegemon: Whom The Gods Would Destroy", "Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order", "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation", and not to forget: "Target China" to name only a few. His books are translated into 14 foreign languages. 

His latest book on the role of the NGOs focuses on their involvement in US regime change operations and in steering up fabricated mass protests to facilitate the efforts of the US Empire and the CIA to replace resilient national oriented governments by obedient ones that will execute the Washington agenda. All this happens under the pretext of democracy à la US-American style. 

The following interview focuses on Engdahl's latest book in German "Secret files NGOs" (Geheimakte NGOs). It's conducted by Ludwig Watzal, journalist and editor, who lives in Bonn, Germany.

Ludwig Watzal: I guess we could agree upon the fact that the CIA is the world's worst terror organization. After WW II, hardly any coup d'état or organized uprising happened without the helping hand of the CIA. As I understood your book, in the last 25 years, the CIA got quite a few so-called little helpers in the form of NGOs. Please, could you elaborate on that? 

William Engdahl: During the Reagan Presidency very damaging scandals were becoming public about CIA dirty operations around the world. Chile, Iran, Guatemala, the top secret MK-Ultra project the student movement during the Vietnam War to name just a few. To take the spotlight away from them, CIA Director Bill Casey proposed to Reagan creating a “private” NGO, a kind of cut-out that would pose as private, but in reality, as one of its founders the late Allen Weinstein said in a later interview to the Washington Post, “doing what the CIA did, but privately.” This was the creation of the NGO named National Endowment for Democracy in 1983. Soon other Washington-steered NGOs were added like the Freedom House or the Soros Open Society Foundations, the United States Institute of Peace and so forth. 

The money was often channeled via USAID of the State Department to hide its origin. Every major regime attack by the US Government since then including the Solidarnosc in Poland, the Yeltsin CIA-backed Russia coup, the 2004 Ukraine Orange Revolution, the 2008 Tibet riots, the Arab Spring of 2011 to today—all have been done by this group of very select “democracy” NGOs. Little wonder that countries like Russia and China or Hungary act to ban them as “undesirable NGOs.”

LW: You quote Allen Weinstein, co-author of the founding act of the NGO National Endowment for Democracy (NED), saying; "Much of what we do today was done 25 years ago by the CIA." Are the US NGOs such as NED, CIPE, USAID, NDI not to speak of the Soros network the fifth column of the CIA? 

WE: As I indicated above, I would say so in my opinion. Invariably their NGO agenda fits the given agenda of Washington foreign policy. Coincidence? I don’t believe so. 

LW: Your critic focused mainly on a few US NGOs or would you include all non-governmental organizations in general? Aren't all these NGOs driven by a good mind and noble deeds to spread democracy and freedom around the world? 

WE: This is the devil in the concept of Bill Casey. Hiding very black dirty anti-democratic CIA operations behind private political NGOs waving the banner of “Human Rights” has been very effective for Washington’s global agenda of toppling un-cooperative regimes around the world. In effect the CIA has weaponized human rights. Curiously useful regimes for Washington such as Saudi Arabia go unbothered by calls for democracy. Their oil billions finance Washington’s global terrorism agenda. 

Take the recent case of the fake democracy White Helmets NGO in Syria doing propaganda in intimate cooperation with ISIS, to justify the US-led war against the duly elected Assad regime. White Helmets get money reportedly from Soros Foundations, from the US and UK governments and were created by a former British Army Intelligence officer James Le Mesurier. Their atrocity videos have repeatedly been exposed as fake, staged by actors. Their alleged Sarin gas video showing unprotected White Helmets “first responders” handling alleged Sarin gas victims with no protective HAZMAT protection is a joke, a fake as was exposed widely after by a number of HAZMAT Sarin gas experts. 

The Washington--or EU in some cases—political NGOs are effective because they can attract many innocent good-willed people. I recently received a very touching personal letter from a European Medical Doctor who had been 18 months working with the best humanitarian intention with Doctors without Borders in South Sudan before their US-backed independence. She was so grateful after reading my NGO book as she could understand all the seeming irrational directions their American Doctors Without Borders leader gave the staff. She quit because of burnout and now said she understands why. Honest doctors were being used by Washington for secret political agendas. South Sudan was target because China was receiving a major share of her oil from there via Khartoum. 

Of course not all NGOs are doing the work of the CIA. I focus on the ones with a hidden political agenda, who, as I describe in the book, have weaponized human rights and the word democracy for devious ends. 

LW: In 1984, the hedge fund-Billionaire George Soros, established in Budapest the Soros Foundation. His first target was Poland. Pope John Paul II and US President Ronald Reagan met in 1982 at the Vatican to discuss the destabilization of the Communist Bloc. In this endeavor, has there also been an involvement of the Soros Foundation? 

WE: The Soros Foundation established the Stefan Batory Foundation in Warsaw in 1988 to train activists to ultimately topple the Communist regime. They played a major role “building democracy” and immediately after the collapse in Poland of the government of General Czesław Kiszczak in August, 1989. Soros brought Harvard University "Shock Therapy" economist Jeffrey Sachs into Poland to push privatization of state enterprises, create a hyperinflation and open choice Polish state assets for auction to western investors like friends of Soros for pennies or then, for pfennig. 

LW: The two chapters on the plundering of the former Soviet Union by the CIA, Soros and his Harvard Boys in cooperation with the Yeltsin clan and former KGB official is quite shocking. Please, elaborate on this Mafia-like undertaking? 

WE: I have to refer readers to the book as the treatment has been cross-checked and is exhaustive. In brief, the CIA under the direction of then-President George H.W. Bush managed to corrupt several very high-ranking KGB generals who recruited a network of young Komsomol or Communist Union of Youth proteges such as Boris Berezovsky and Mikhail Khodorkovsky to become their hand-picked “oligarchs” to plunder the State assets for pennies compared to their true worth. This was the infamous “voucher” scandal that valued the entire state assets including oil and gas, machine-making companies, high-tech, all at a little under $16 billion. They literally raped Russia for personal gain. And the CIA and its network of Western banks such as Riggs Bank in Washington allowed them to launder the money out of Russia. Even I was shocked to verify the details. It was criminal. Yeltsin was their boy. Some said so long as his supply of good Vodka was guaranteed he would do anything Soros and his Harvard economists demanded. 

The interesting point to note is that President G.H. W Bush, former director of the CIA, ordered three simultaneous NGO destabilizations in the same year, 1989. The three were Russia, China in Tiananmen Square and Yugoslavia. The book documents this in great detail.

LW:  After Vladimir Putin succeeded Boris Yeltsin as Russia's President, he immediately stopped the robbing of Russia. Do you think that could be one cause why the political class in Washington hates and demonizes him to such an extent, which is irrational? 

WE: Putin came from a Russian nationalist faction (as opposed to what were called cosmopolitan or internationalist faction) of the KGB and its successor. They knew they had to act with stealth until their grip was secure in 2000 when Yeltsin was forced to quietly “retire” or face revelations and Yeltsin was convinced to name Putin acting President. 

There has been an undeclared war against a stable nation-state in Russia since well before 1917. The founder of Stratfor, George Friedman, one of the better informed American analysts of geopolitics and former consultant to the Pentagon and CIA among others, recently gave an interview after the CIA Ukraine “coup d’ etat” which Friedman called “the most blatant coup in US history.” That if you recall was the one where Viktoria Nuland as US Assistant Secretary of State went to Kiev and handed out candy bars to the protesters in Maidan Square and telephoned her contempt for the EU to the US Ambassador in Kiev. 

Friedman noted what I have documented in my various other books such as Mit der Ölwaffe zur Weltmacht, that the foreign policy of the United States of America for at least the past century as the USA emerged on the decline of the British Empire, the US foreign policy priority has been to prevent at all costs the merging of economic interests and cooperation between especially Germany and Russia. The world has undergone two world wars because of this unfortunate geopolitical dogma of US foreign policy, a dogma taken over from the British and from the father of British geopolitics, Sir Halford Mackinder. 

Washington hates and demonizes Putin for the reason he has moved deliberately to stabilize Russia as a great nation, which it truly is as I can attest from almost 25 years of personal experience. And as a result of Washington’s demonization, Putin’s influence in the world seems only to grow stronger—first with China, then Eurasia nations, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, even the Philippines and Latin America. The world is becoming fed up with the endless agenda of overt and covert USA wars everywhere. We need to look closely behind the Trump words and very soon we find the same old, degenerate oligarchs and their so-called deep-state of unelected bureaucrats at work. 

LW: The dismantling of Yugoslavia was a catastrophe. The Germans under the chancellorship of Gerhard Schroeder and his infamous foreign minister Joschka Fischer joined forces with Clinton to overthrow the Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic. In this coup-like operation, were there also NGOs involved? And what was their strategy? 

WE: Yes. Follow the subsequent career of Mr. Fischer. A street thug from the 1968 Frankfurt protests becomes crowned by the USA and its mainstream media as a statesman, apparently the reward for delivering the Green Party vote for bombing Yugoslavia in 1999. After office, Fischer got an honorary teaching post at my Alma Mater, Princeton. Later George Soros invites Mr Fischer on to his new European council on Foreign Relations think tank. 

In terms of the toppling of Slobodan Milosevic, the US government and its select NGOs including NED and Soros foundations, organized, financed, and trained key student leaders and others in a successful coup, under the name Otpor! (Resistance!), with the now -ubiquitous logo of the threatening clenched fist. Serbian translations of Gene Sharp's writings on nonviolent action were used and the key leaders were personally trained by Sharp’s associate US Army colonel Robert Helvey in secret meeting places to avoid police. Otpor! got by some estimates as much as $30 million from U.S. government-linked organizations such as the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), International Republican Institute (IRI), and US Agency for International Development (USAID). The destruction of Yugoslavia was orchestrated since the 1980’s by Washington, first Bush sr. then Clinton. The aim was to create a war in Europe to justify the continued presence of a NATO whose raison d'être after the collapse of the Soviet Union was hard to justify to American taxpayers or to the Europeans who were planning an independent European Defense Pillar apart from NATO. For Washington and the influential US military industrial complex such independence was tabu!. The second aim was to establish a huge US military presence later in Kosovo called Camp Bond Steel. 

LW: When the Arab masses went into the streets of Tunis, Cairo and Tripoli, the Western media, and political class were thrilled. Finally, democracy, freedom, and human rights found their way into the Arab world. Were these uprisings spontaneous or were they organized and orchestrated from outside forces? 

WE: The entire Arab Spring was secretly planned and financed by Washington and US-financed NGOs. Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a key figure along with her bizarre Muslim Brotherhood assistant Huma Abedin. The RAND Corporation, which is a Pentagon think tank responsible for developing the technique of mob “swarming” like bees, as a way using facebook and social media to steer protests, played a key role. 

The protest student groups in Egypt were US-trained, again using translations of Gene Sharp, they were brought to Europe to be secretly trained by the leaders of Otpor!

In the case of Libya’s Qaddafi, a more urgent regime change was deemed necessary as the now-famous DCLeaks and Wikileaks emails of Hillary to her private adviser Sidney Blumenthal reveal. Qaddafi, who contrary to his demonized image had built up Libya with the highest living standard in all Africa, was about to unveil creation of an alliance of Muslim central banks and introduction of a Gold Dinar currency for oil sales not US dollars. He was doing so together with Ben Ali of Tunisia and Mubarak in Egypt. As Hillary wrote to Blumenthal, that had to be blocked by whatever means. The means to “block” were the illegal bombing of Libya and the assassination of Qaddafi and turning Libya into a field of rubble. The original Pentagon-CIA-State Department plan called for the immediate toppling of another thorn in Washington’s side immediately after Qaddafi, that was Bashar al Assad in Syria. That has not worked out well for the Washington planners and a great human tragedy unnecessarily has grown out of 6 years of what essentially is a US-led war there. 

LW: In the old days, the conquerors brought in its wake the missionaries. Today, the Western neo-colonial powers come with hundreds of NGOs who teach the indigenous population how Western democracy is supposed to function. Do you think the NGOs serve the interest of these people? What about the German NGOs who especially carry a lot of ideological ballast, for example, in the form of gender mainstreaming with them? What do you make of that?

WE: I think your analogy with the “Christian” missionaries of the past and the “Human Rights” or “democracy” NGOs today is very fitting. I am not competent to comment on the activities of various German NGOs. My main focus is Washington, the hegemonic power today and source of so much that is destructive, unfortunately.

LW:  At the beginning and at the end of your book you refer to George Orwell's doublethink that means "War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength." Do we live in times where the original meanings of words become different contents? Do the US Empire and its vassal states wage war in the name of democracy and destroy the nation states with the same democratic rhetoric?

WE: This is why I found the Orwell quote so appropriate. His book 1984 in many ways is a description of what has been allowed to happen to our western democracies, especially in Britain and the USA.

LW: If you could give the NGOs a piece of advice, what would you tell them? 

WE: For the honest persons who may have got caught up in nice rhetoric about values, human rights and such, I would suggest looking more closely at the money trail feeding your given NGO. For the NED or Soros foundations I would suggest they would all do mankind a favor by shutting their doors permanently. That you allow nations and individuals to decide their own sovereign future without your unwanted meddling. I would say, to paraphrase Cromwell to the British Long Parliament, ”You human rights NGOs, Go! You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!"

LW: Mr. Engdahl, thanks for the interview. 

WE: Thank you for your interest and excellent questions.

First published here, here, here, and here.

Published in Italian here.

Wish You Weren’t Here – or Zionist Propaganda against Roger Waters

Roger Waters; Courtesy of MWC News,

Was it coincidence or planning that around the same time two Zionist propaganda pieces against the BDS movement and its activists were or are going to be broadcasted? 

This summer, Ian Halperin's documentary "Wish You Weren't Here" will be shown. Halperin, a Canadian, is an award-winning filmmaker, journalist, and a bestselling author. He focuses on Roger Waters, a former Pink Floyd leader. Waters is the most prominent BDS-activist and an outspoken critic of Israel's brutal occupation of Palestine. Waters lobbies among his colleagues and artists to boycott Israel. Therefore, the Zionist Lobby accuses Waters of "Anti-Semitism." 

Halperin traveled the world for two years and talked to prominent Zionists such as Eliot Engel, Ronald Lauder, Akiva Tor, Alan Dershowitz, Charles Small, Israeli and Palestinian politicians and many other experts. Apparently, the documentary is "jaw-dropping." One has to be skeptical when a film, overwhelmed prematurely with rave reviews, which deals with BDS and Israel and its critics. In Germany, we were also confronted with a lousy Zionist propaganda job. 

A few Weeks ago, a shoddy piece of craft, produced by the German documentary filmmaker Joachim Schroeder under the title "Chosen and excluded - the Hatred of Jews in Europe." Public television financed this lousy work. The German public TV relies on mandatory fees from every household whether they have a television or not. First, the broadcasting corporation refused to air it but had yielded to huge Zionist pressure.

After the broadcast, a panel of experts discussed the documentary. A Zionist bully dominated the discussion. He once taught history at the Armed Forces University in Munich. Accompanied by a Zionist Muslim, who can be considered a "good Muslim" because he had more empathy towards Israel and the Jews than to its oppressed Palestinians brethren. On the other side, a Jewish professor who teaches medical psychology at the University of Lübeck, a former German minister of labor and a journalist was unable to hold a candle to them. These critics could not enforce their arguments because of their humble attitude. The Zionist Muslim, quite seriously, suggested that the young Muslims in Germany should travel to Auschwitz concentration camp like the young Israelis do who get brainwashed there. 

Comparing Halperin to Schroeder, the first one is a completely different caliber. Wherever Schroeder deals with the Zionist lobbyists and their Muslim servants, Halperin deals with the big shots of the show business. Schroeder already produced a pseudo-satirical soap opera called "Either Broder- The Germany Safari" and "Either Broder - The Europe Safari." Compared to the just aired Zionist propaganda documentary, the soup about Broder together with his Muslim servant Hamad Abdel-Samad, who searched for Anti-Semitism, Anti-Americanism, Xenophobia et cetera, was at least in part funny and bizarre. Right now, Schroeder has just completed another piece about two prominent Zionists; the German journalist Henryk M. Broder and the Dutch writer Leon de Winter. Whereas Broder writes for every Tom, Dick, and Harry, de Winter writes for the more intellectual ones. 

In any case, it's scandalous that a Zionist filmmaker who does such a lousy job receives tons of mandatory fees, for which no one seems responsible.

First published here. 

9/11 Ghosts will haunt the US forever

The US calls itself an exceptional nation; this holds also be true for its criminal energy. The "National Institute of Standards and Technology" (NIST) is just covering up the 9/11 circumstances such as the Bush gang did. The controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC No 7 seems obvious. Watch this revealing and excellent video. Only ignoramuses can deny the overwhelming evidence. Justice still has to be done in the US. Why doesn't the "greatest builder on earth," US President Donald Trump, appoint an independent committee to investigate the real circumstances of 9/11? He knows that the official narrative was made up as his first comments after September 11, demonstrate.

NGOs als Kriegspartei?

Nichtregierungsorganisationen (NGOs) stehen immer noch in dem Ruf, von edlen, humanitären und philanthropischen Motiven geleitet zu sein. Die NGOs sind Teil der Zivilgesellschaft und sollten also in kritischer Distanz zum Staat stehen. Ihr Image scheint tadellos, sie genießen hohe Glaubwürdigkeit und Vertrauen ganz im Gegensatz zu den Politikern. Auch werden sie von den Medien immer noch verhätschelt, befinden sich quasi auf der medialen Sonnenseite. Zu Unrecht, wie das Buch zeigt. Hinter dem Mäntelchen der Wohltätigkeit missbrauchen Geheimdienste und Milliardäre die NGOs für ihre politischen Zwecke.

F. William Engdahl kratzt gehörig am Image dieser "edlen, selbstlosen Ritter". Die NGOs gehen heute wie die CIA vor, aber nur auf privat- und zivilgesellschaftlicher Ebene. "Vieles von dem, was wir heute tun, wurde vor 25 Jahren verdeckt von der CIA erledigt", so Allen Weinstein, Mitverfasser der Gründungsakte des "National Endowment for Democracy" (NED), einer US-NGO, die an allen Aufständen und Staatsstreichen der letzten zwei Jahrzehnte durch die USA maßgeblich beteiligt war. Die Aufgabe von NED bestand darin, auf "hinterhältige Weise systematische US-Propaganda als Waffe zu nutzen, um weltweit Regierungen abzusetzen, die sich nicht Washingtons Agenda fügen wollten. (...) Das NED war ein Werkzeug, um etwas zu erschaffen, was wir als Scheindemokratie bezeichnen können, mit dem Ziel, Washingtons globale Agenda zu fördern", schreibt der Autor. 

Die Wurzeln dieser Umsturzstrategien reichen bis zu den durch die CIA gesteuerten französischen Studentenrevolten im Mai 1968 zurück, die zum Ende der Präsidentschaft von Charles de Gaulle führten. De Gaulle hatte sich immer der US-Globalhegemonie entgegengestellt. Engdahl dokumentiert das zerstörerische der NGOs, die an allen geopolitischen Entwicklungen maßgeblich beteiligt waren und immer noch sind. Sie versprechen nur das Beste für die Völker: Frieden, Menschenrechte und Demokratie. Tatsächlich bringen sie in ihren Tornistern Krieg, Gewalt und Terror. Unter dem Deckmantel der Wohltätigkeit werden von den NGOs Kriege und Geheimdienstoperationen "humanitär" bemäntelt, begleitet und umgesetzt.

Die gleichen NGOs arbeiteten heute an der Zerstörung der Souveränität der europäischen Nationalstaaten. Auch Deutschland werde, ähnlich den Staaten der Dritten Welt und Osteuropas, von besagen NGOs durch ein riesiges sozialtechnisches Projekt umgestaltet. Fast alle NGOs werden von dem Hedgefonds-Spekulanten George Soros finanziert. In engster Verbindung mit der CIA und dem US-Außenministerium arbeiten sie an der "Neuen Weltordnung", wie sie David Rockefeller genannt hat. 

Dass diese Kreise an einer "Welteinheitsregierung" arbeiten hat kein anderer als der "Pate" dieser Idee, Rockefeller, in seinen Memoiren bestätigt. Der Autor zitiert daraus: "Einige glauben sogar, wir seien ein Teil eines geheimen, intriganten Unterfangens gegen die Interessen der USA. Sie charakterisieren mich und meine Familie als "Internationalisten", die sich weltweit mit anderen verschworen haben, um eine neue, stärker integrierte, globale politische und wirtschaftliche Struktur aufzubauen - eine Welteinheitsregierung, wenn man so will, Wenn das der Vorwurf ist, bekenne ich mich schuldig, und ich bin stolz darauf." (FN 2, S. 223)

Einer der größten und gefährlichsten Strippenzieher in Hintergrund ist George Soros. Sein umfangreiches Netzwerk hat sich wie eine Krake um zahlreiche Länder gelegt, um sie zu destabilisieren und für einen Regierungsumsturz vorzubereiten. Was im Augenblick im Mittelmeer vor sich geht, kann als organisierter Menschenschmuggel durch NGOs bezeichnet werden, die den Schleuserbanden die Flüchtlinge gleich nach ihrem Auslaufen vor Libyens Küste durch ihre gecharterten Schiffe "retten". Der Ermittler und Rechtsanwalt William Craddick fand heraus, dass einige von den NGOs, die die Schmuggelschiffe gechartert hatten, "von Georges Soros und dessen Open Society Foundations finanziell betreut wurden, darunter die zur Soros-gestützten Gruppe Moveon.org gehörige Organisation avaaz.org, Save the Children und Mèdecins sans frontières (MSF)", so der Autor. Eine Soros-NGO stand auch hinter dem Putsch vom Majdan in Kiew. 

Um die Politik in Europa in seinem Sinne zu beeinflussen, habe Soros in London einen "European Council on Foreign Relations" (ECFR) ins Leben gerufen. Dieser ist seinem großen Vorbild in New York nachempfunden. Der ECFR hat auch eine Zweigniederlassung in Berlin. Zahlreiche deutsche Mitglieder gehören dem ECFR an. Dieser Council unter Leitung von Soros zielt darauf ab, das "Antlitz und das Sozialgefüge der EU zu verändern". Nicht ohne Grund haben Russland und China diese "scheindemokratischen Menschrechts"-NGOs von ihrem Territorium verbannt. 

Wer die elf Kapitel dieses sehr informativen und extrem spannenden Buches liest, kommt aus dem Staunen nicht mehr heraus. Die Kapitel drei und vier, in denen über die Ausplünderung Russlands durch die CIA, zusammen mit den "Harvard-Boys" und Soros in Kooperation mit dem KGB und dem damaligen Präsidenten Boris Jelzin, berichtet wird, sind atemberaubend. Jetzt wird auch verständlich, warum die gesamte politische Klasse der USA, inklusive der Medien, Präsident Vladimir Putin so hasst und dämonisiert, weil er es war, der diese Ausplünderung gestoppt hat. Die russischen Oligarchen haben sich an der Zerstörung und Ausplünderung Russlands massiv beteiligt, sodass ihre Verfolgung und Anklage durch Putin mehr als berechtigt erscheint. Die westlichen Medien haben aus ihnen zu Unrecht Verfolgte gemacht. "Die Zerstörung der Sowjetunion war eine der finstersten kriminellen Machenschaften, die je von einer US-Regierung angezettelt wurden." Zur Schwächung des gesamten Ostblocks führte die Unterstützung der polnischen Solidarnosc-Bewegung durch NED.

Die Zerstörung Jugoslawiens war ebenfalls ein Gemeinschaftswerk der US-geführten NATO, der CIA und ihrer NGOs. "Die Ereignisse in und um Jugoslawien sollten dazu genutzt werden, die NATO bis vor die Haustüre Moskaus zu erweitern, mit einer Reichweite bis ins ferne Afghanistan." Die CIA war auch für Umsiedlung von afghanischen Mudschaheddin-Kämpfern nach Bosnien verantwortlich. Der monatelange Bombenterror der NATO gegen Serbien führte zum Sturz von Slobodan Milosevics und diente nur dem Ziel, die NATO unter US-Führung auf Krieg einzustimmen und den USA eine riesige Militärbasis (Camp Bondsteel) im Kosovo zu sichern, auf der zeitweise bis zu 7000 US-Soldaten stationiert sind. 

Durch massiven Druck auf die serbische Regierung musste diese Milosevic an das Kriegsverbrechertribunal in Den Haag ausliefern. Vor diesem korrupten Pseudo-Gericht gab es für Milosevic nicht den Hauch einer Chance. Der Gerechtigkeit wurde Hohn gesprochen. Nach fünf Jahren Haft fand man den serbischen Präsidenten tot in seiner Zell. "So war auf bequeme Weise ein unangenehmer Zeuge der wahren Rolle der USA und der NATO bei der Zerschlagung Jugoslawiens aus dem Wege geräumt", schreibt Engdahl. 

Wer meint, das die Proteste der Menschen auf dem Tian'anmen-Platz in Peking, in Iran, Georgien, der Ukraine oder beim so genannten Arabischen Frühling aus dem Nichts heraus entstanden sind, wird durch den Autor eines Besseren belehrt. Keiner dieser Massenproteste war spontan, sondern minutiös geplant. Auch die Absetzung des ägyptischen Präsidenten Hosni Mubaraks oder Ben Ali in Tunesien hatten mit Spontanität wenig zu tun, sondern vielmehr mit generalstabsmäßiger Planung. Auch der Putsch in der Ukraine war von der CIA und den NGOs mit Hilfe von faschistischen Söldnern von außen gesteuert. Das einzige Unterscheidungsmerkmal dieser Staatstreiche war die unterschiedliche Farbe, unter der die Aktionen abliefen. Die Regisseure und die Akteure waren immer die gleichen.

Das Fazit des Autors ist zugleich ernüchternd und niederschmetternd für das US-Imperium. "Der jahrzehntelange US-Export von Scheindemokratie hat nicht ein einziges Land dazu gebracht, authentische Schritte in Richtung einer repräsentativen Demokratie zu unternehmen." Der destruktiven Politik Washingtons und seinen NATO-Vasallen haben Russland, China, die Shanghaier Organisation für Zusammenarbeit (SOZ) und die Eurasische Wirtschaftsunion eine konstruktive Alternative entgegengesetzt, und zwar den Aufbau von Nationen auf der Grundlage von Autonomie, Souveränität und der Gleichheit aller Staaten vor dem Völkerrecht.

Dieses Buch ist ein absolutes Muss. Es ist sehr informativ, spannend von der ersten bis zur letzten Seite, sehr verständlich geschrieben und überaus akribisch recherchiert. Einfach exzellent!